Apprised of these facts, Ed said, "We should go to that meeting."
No way.
Let someone else go to that meeting.
We have one more year in this school -- well, one and a half -- then it's so long and farewell!
This is my feeling.
I must say, the new principal does have some political savvy. I like the guy, and I don't particularly feel like attending the Board meeting in order lob hand grenades at the middle school model.
So I've contented myself with lobbing one great big, pulsing hand grenade via the Irvington Parents Forum.
That one fell into my lap. A friend emailed asking whether I knew anything about the middle school model.
I did.
What I didn't know was that the NMSA website, the officially cited organization that is to middle schools what the NCTM is to math, contains pages and pages of Public Relations Resources for "middle level educators."
Nor did I know that the NMSA is of the opinion that:
There may be no task more important today for middle level educators than public relations. National Middle School Association (NMSA) is committed to helping you build support for quality middle level schools. Join us in taking action to gain visibility for successful middle grades programs and practices by using the following resources designed to help you be a successful public relations practitioner.
Oh yeah, that's the hard sell.
My line on public relations for educators is:
Any organization or corporation that has to develop marketing campaigns to convince parents of its worth is an organization or corporation selling something I don’t want to buy.
Quick PR Ideas
"practical, low-cost, proven public relations ideas that have worked in schools everywhere"
such as -
Have Parents Speak Up for YouEncourage your PTA or PTSA to sponsor a "Get to Know X Middle School—It's a Great Place to Learn" night at feeder elementary schools. Invite the elementary parents to the meeting and have your parents explain the value your school provides students. Encourage questions. Your parents can deliver a highly credible message to other parents.
or:
Create a program where your students teach senior citizens computing skills. Email can help seniors keep in touch with their family and the world, but many of them aren't confident using computers. Your students can teach them the basic skills. Students might also play computer games with seniors and write them occasionally. Let seniors know that the school can serve them. Let Students Demonstrate Their Computer Skills
Use ThemesThemes can communicate what people can expect from your school. If you don't have a meaningful theme, get one. Then look for every possible place to use it-school newsletters, home page of a school web site, lunch menus, report cards, calendars, school letterhead, and even envelops since more people see the envelop than the letter.
yup
That ought to do it.
You've got parents so ticked off about curiculum, pedagogy, and student achievement that they're voting down bonds, walking out of math nights, and writing blogs - TIME TO CREATE A THEME!
TIME TO CREATE A THEME AND USE IT EVERYWHERE INCLUDING REPORT CARDS, SCHOOL CALENDARS, AND EVEN ENVELOPES BECAUSE MORE PEOPLE SEE THE ENVELOPE THAN THE LETTER!
how to write an op-ed
What Is an Op-Ed Article?
An Op-Ed or Opinion Article is an opinion piece published in a newspaper but written by someone who is not on that newspaper's staff. Many large dailies, smaller dailies, and weekly newspapers use op-eds somewhere in their editorial section. On many large newspapers, that paper's editorials, the editorial cartoon and columns by staff writers will appear on one editorial page. Opposite that page, the op-ed articles will be run, and that's where the term "op-ed" comes from—it's opposite the editorial page.The important point is that these articles provide anyone with the chance to publish his or her opinion. You don't have to convince a reporter to cover something; you can express your opinion. You may see that the president of the chamber of commerce is published in the op-ed columns. This opportunity is available to you, too.
question: Do middle level educators not know what an op-ed article is?
This stuff must be mortifying to actual middle school teachers.
how to write an op-ed article, part 2
So What Do I Do?
First, determine whether newspapers in your area use op-ed articles. You can do this simply by reading the editorial pages. See if national columnists or local officials are published. Read these articles. Become familiar with style, length, format, messages, and anything else that makes them stand out.
Second, decide what you would like to write. Sample topics for educators might include:
- How parents can help students learn
- What's right with education
- Success of our local school
- The importance of middle level education
- The need for resources in education
- How the community can support its school
I'm starting to grasp the obvious reality that these organizations are even more condescending to teachers than to parents.
Or not.
The sample op-ed article, provided to middle level educators for their use, is a 666 word essay (666!) advising parents on ways to ways to help young adolescents grow.
theme contest
So say you were a middle level educator trying to drum up enthusiasm for the middle school model.
What theme would you pick?
Entries should be dated no later than midnight February 28, 2007; no limit on number submitted per household.
Wow.
ReplyDeleteWOW!
I’m so naïve. Or, rather, I WAS so naïve.
Wow!
How about this one:
ReplyDelete"Middle School: Usually Not as Bad as Prison"
or:
"Middle School: While We Don't Actually Teach Anything, at Least We Don't Teach Anything Wrong (Except in "Character Education" and "Physical Education", Anyway)"
Note that these are just working titles, of course, so I'm sure they could be punched up with a little work.
Your district doesn't seem to have anything better to do than to jump on every quackery bandwagon. Instituting middle schoolism is a very bad idea. Apart from the anti-academic prescriptions of the middle school movement, it's a bad idea to rip adoloscents out of their familiar environment and isolate them.
ReplyDeleteI wrote about this movement at my site.
Middle schools are a major target of an anti-intellectual movement dubbed "middle schoolism" that sees middle schools more like a psychiatric ward than a place for academic achievement. In fact, it is hostile to academic achievement.
Now the veil is ripped off the ugly face of middle schoolism in a just-released
major study by the Fordham Foundation.
The study concludes that middle schoolism together with be lingering effects of the bizarre theory of "brain periodization" should be consigned to history's dustbin.
As a teacher of middle graders I know first-hand that early adolescents are perfectly capable of academic achievement and are not the dysfunctional monsters the movement would have us believe they are.
Excerpt from The Education Gladfly:
Fie on Middle Schoolism
If ever an education fad showed dreadful timing, reaching its intellectual and political pinnacle just as lightning struck the mountaintop, it's "middle schoolism." The key year was 1989, when the middle school bible, an influential Carnegie-backed report named Turning Points, was published. It hit just as the governors and then-President Bush gathered in Charlottesville to place the United States squarely astride the standards-based reform that is antithetical to the central message of this education religion.
In the ensuing decade and a half, the National Middle School Association (NMSA) and its acolytes, flying the banner of Turning Points and arguing that the middle grades are no time for academic learning, argued with great success that these schools should be devoted to social adjustment, coping with hormonal throbs, and looking out for the needs of the "whole child."
That is the essence of middle schoolism as set forth in a stunning new Fordham report by Cheri Pierson Yecke. It's a jeremiad drawing upon gobs of evidence that show the middle grades are where U.S. student achievement begins its fateful plunge and where a growing number of other nations begins to outpace us.
Thank you for the information Instructivist.
ReplyDeleteI just got done lookng at the nmsa.org site (No Middle School Academics) and my brain turned to mush. Can you say low expectations?
It's one thing to have these opinions, but quite another to be so arrogant that you want to push them on everyone else. The schools know that many, many parents hate this crap. I would be supremely embarrassed to force kids into this sort of educational system.
The movement does want to impose their gospel on everyone with religious zeal.
ReplyDeleteYou can get their Bible called This We Believe here: http://www.nmsa.org/SearchResults/tabid/1083/txtSearch/poster/List/1/ProductID/82/Default.aspx
I've heard reports that middle school teaming has been valuable for newer teachers. Moving to middle schools exacerbated our senior teacher loss (they opted to leave the jr high for the high school). If grade levels are unchanged and you're not losing senior teachers, I'm not aware of any benefit from adopting the middle school model.
ReplyDeleteInstructivist pretty well covers it; I'd add that this is a failed attempt to comply with desegregation requirements by mixing students and dumbing down course content rather than providing genuinely compensatory education to victims of past racial discrimination.
Our state paper had a big editorial piece titled: "American education; Should focus be teaching or testing"
ReplyDeleteOf course the answer is yes.
What he (an ed school professor, of course) is really talking about is standardized testing. (By the way, what strings do you have to pull to get a one-third page letter to the editor?) Most all schools do testing. He just doesn't like testing for mastery of the basics. As I have always said, what knowledge is so important that it allows students to flunk trivial state standardized tests? What makes it so difficult to do both mastery of the basics and all of the fuzzy learning they want?
They just don't like mastery of the basics. Rote knowledge, drill and kill, mere facts, superficial knowledge. Perhaps they do like mastery, but think that mastery can be achieved top down, thematically, using some sort of osmosis technique? The writer pushed integrated learning where students "think across disciplines". Top down or thematic learning, especially when it's spiraled, does not ensure mastery.
They don't like hard work, so they have to decide that hard work is not necessary for education.
In some ways, it's about academic turf. Ed schools don't do content and skills. If they do, it's just the ed school version of content. They have nothing left but to dream up all sorts of fuzzy ideas of education that give them an aura of respectability. At cocktail parties they can spout off on grand theories, rather than how they train teachers to teach kids that invert and multiply is really easy to do, is easy to understand, and is very important.
With all of their generalized happy talk of higher-order thinking, they can avoid discussing all of the dirty details. This happens in schools all of the time. Schools talk of grand concepts and perhaps even about balance, but then the parents go away and they get to decide all of the details. Generalities also give them lots of wiggle room - plausible denial. Fuzzy learning also removes the need for any level of teaching accountability. Spiral the kids along, put the learning onus on kids and their parents, and then blame exteral causes when they fail later on. They have no way of knowing whether they are doing a good job or not. Some kids will do well in spite of it all, and that's all they will see.
The writer also brought up the idea that education has been based on the "early 20th Century factory system". He finishes with:
"It is time that our students learn to think, prepare to become tomorrow's leaders, and develop a real zeal for learning."
How to be a leader and "think" without mastery of the basics. They can grow up to think and lead like the clueless pointy-haired boss.
Just when I thought I couldn't be further disillusioned about the state of education.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the links. I'm sure going to need this stuff in another year when we embark on the middle school experience.
So I read the Op-Ed, and the nearest theme I can make out is "Middle School: Parenting the Child so You Don't Have To."
ReplyDeleteOr how about, "Middle School: A Ten-Foot Pole."
Having read Instructivist's comments, what is the point of your school district affliating with NMSA except that it will provide an excuse for teachers and administrators to attend conferences and workshops? Are the conferences held in nice, warm places of the country like Florida, in the middle of winter? Do the workshops happen during the school year so that subs can be called in and the teachers get a little break from those awful pre-adolescent adolescents? What's the point? What is the school district buying?
I went looking; yes, the NMSA conferences are held in nice, warm places like Florida and Texas.
ReplyDeleteMiddle School: Usually Not as Bad as Prison
ReplyDeleteI think we have a winner!
Middle School: Usually Not as Bad as Prison
ReplyDeleteI think we have a winner!
more like a psychiatric ward than a place for academic achievement
ReplyDeleteOh, that's funny!
I just this morning wrote a post for the Irvington Parents Forum on the subject of therapeutic language used in Character Ed:
Our own school has “character” words scotch-taped to the entryway: ownership, friendship, etc. Personally I don’t care for the word “ownership” as a descriptor of good character. “Ownership” is a therapy word, not a character word. If we’re going to have character slogans scotch-taped to the entryway, I’d like to see quotations from Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln, the Founding Fathers, etc. Let’s have character words and sayings that emphasize an academic mission. (An Irvington parent sent me an email suggesting this change.)
They're harassing the kids about litter; apparently they've been imposing lunchtime detention for entire grades (or "teams") because the kids are messing up the field.
ReplyDeleteThe assitant principal is telling the kids that they must "take ownership" of the school and put their garbage in the garbage can.
Christopher said, "If we owned the school, couldn't we do what we want?"
I dislike the word "ownership" intensely.
ReplyDelete"Ownership" is not good character.
I'm not even sure that putting your garbage in the garbage can is good character.
It's good behavior.
If the kids are littering the field (they are) they need to go out there and pick it up.
If they can figure out who's littering the field those kids should have detention.
I dislike the word "ownership" intensely.
ReplyDelete"Ownership" is not good character.
I'm not even sure that putting your garbage in the garbage can is good character.
It's good behavior.
If the kids are littering the field (they are) they need to go out there and pick it up.
If they can figure out who's littering the field those kids should have detention.
Moving to middle schools exacerbated our senior teacher loss (they opted to leave the jr high for the high school).
ReplyDeleteInteresting.
Can you say low expectations?
ReplyDeleteOur low expectations really are staggering.
Any course that is "conceptual" is, apparently, deemed by our middle school to be appropriate for only perhaps 25% of the class.
This is 25% of a class of kids already highly self-selected by parents who've chosen to live here.
It really is scandalous.
Generalities also give them lots of wiggle room - plausible denial.
ReplyDeleteyup
I learned something interesting this week.
ReplyDeleteThree different parents have now told me that they were told, when their kids took an accelerated science course in 8th grade (2 different courses in 2 different years), that the course was "Honors."
In fact, neither course was an Honors course.
It was merely an accelerated course, which means a regular course normally taught in 9th or 10th grade pushed back to 8th grade.
But parents were explicitly told that the course was Honors. So they say.
I have in writing, from the guidance counselor, the fact that the course is not Honors:
Thursday June 15 1:26 pm
Mrs. Johnson,
I asked Mr. Fried about the assessments and he says the results will be mailed home.
In regards to accelerated (it is not honors) science, there are a number of areas that the committee looks at when selecting students for the class. Students are evaluated by:
1)ELA and Math state tests
2)CTBS (California test of basic skills) test that will be administered in Science classes next year
3)His 7th grade science teacher will rate him in the areas of tests and labs
4)7th grade science grades
5)7th grade teachers will rate him in the areas of notebook, hmk and other (this includes- participation in class, maturity, proactive with seeking extra help)
We enter all the information onto a chart and the committee then selects the students who have the highest scores/rankings.
I hope this answers your questions, if you need anything else please let me know.
Griffin Murray
Why would parents be told, or allowed to believe, that an accelerated course is an Honors course?
I have to believe this was a pre-emptive strike.
Administrators & parents alike believe that Honors courses "aren't for everyone."
It is universally held that if a student is struggling in an Honors course he doesn't belong in the course.
Under normal circumstances - inside a school in which everyone is being taught advanced material - that would be a sound assumption.
So that's the assumption.
So say you're the middle school and you've got two classes full of 8th graders who are going to be taking a high school course in which they'll receive high school grades that will go on their high school transcripts and affect their high school GPAs.
How are the parents going to react when they have Cs coming home on the report card?
If it's an accelerated course they're going to be ticked.
If it's an Honors course they can't complain.
Honors courses are "conceptual."
Conceptual courses "aren't for everyone."
I'm going to guess that the school didn't directly lie to parents.
ReplyDeleteI'm going to guess that the school did something like what Ms. K did when "Math Dad" challenged her to tell him what she considered the difference to be between a test item for an Honors course and a test item for an accelerated course.
Her answer was, "I think they're the same thing."
I'll bet that parents of kids in the accelerated 7th grade science class had some kind of meeting with someone - maybe back to school night, maybe 8th grade transition night, who knows? - at which the distinction between "accelerated" and "Honors" was elided.
(elided?)
They came away believing their children were taking a high-level, conceptual, Honors course.
Our school writes nothing down.
ReplyDeleteEver.
No one has anything in writing.
That can't be an accident.
I've decided to start writing things down, asking the principal to check for accuracy, and publishing them to the Forum.
ReplyDeleteIf the school won't put things in writing, I will.
They're harassing the kids about litter; apparently they've been imposing lunchtime detention for entire grades (or "teams") because the kids are messing up the field.
ReplyDeleteIs there a lack of peer pressure in your middle school? Do students not blame each other enough for things like litter? I have to think that detention for all for the crimes of a few has got to be an admission that peer pressure is a good thing.
I can just see an administrator sitting around thinking, "Hmm. There's litter. If we can spur some fights and bad feeling between kids over this litter stuff, that could be a good thing. Yeah, that's good character!!"
I would say that the kids have exactly zero interest in litter.
ReplyDeleteChristopher is a complete slob.
It's a CONSTANT battle around here, trying to get him to pick things up.
It's just not in his brain.
Once he's done with something he's forgotten he ever had it.
Of course, that's happening to me more and more often, too.
as in: Where did I put my car keys?
I went looking; yes, the NMSA conferences are held in nice, warm places like Florida and Texas.
ReplyDeleteoh yeah
Florida
Texas
in the dead of winter
a whole lot of selling to do!
I dislike the word "ownership" intensely.
ReplyDelete"Ownership" is not good character.
Ownership of what? Litter. Give me a break. Find out who is littering and punish those who are the culprits. Why should everyone suffer?
My third grader comes home furious because kids in his class are misbehaving and he gets docked recess points. I'm sure there are times he is part of the group who is misbehaving. However, I'm sure there are times he is not.
When I asked his teacher about my him being upset, she said, "he just needs to understand that we make choices as a group and individually and when we make bad ones their are consequences. He is very sensitive to this I agree but this is one on the things we will continue to work on here at school, as I am sure you will at home."
Why doesn't she just take the names who are misbehaving and punish them? Why punish the whole group? Is she hoping this will build character? It builds resentment if you ask me!
--PaulaV
My third grader comes home furious because kids in his class are misbehaving and he gets docked recess points.
ReplyDeleteCollective punishment!
Against the Geneva Conventions!
we make choices as a group
ReplyDeleteCollective punishment is unethical.
Even our former principal knew that.
Our current principal, unfortunately, does not.
There may be no task more important today for middle level educators than public relations.
ReplyDeleteThis is outrageous. My god, you're a school! Can't you think of something ever so slightly more important than PR? Like actually, perhaps, teaching some kids?
"Ownership of what? Litter. Give me a break."
ReplyDeleteIt reminds me of the slogan:
"Put litter in its place."
OK. On the ground.
Hi, Tracy
ReplyDeleteIt's a nightmare.
Ed went to the school board meeting last night....words fail me.
Militant edu-blah-blah.
The good news is that K-5 parents are simply furious.
The other good news is that Board members strongly pushed the administration on differentiated instruction.
How do we know it's working?
They asked this repeatedly.
Didn't get an answer.
"Collective punishment is unethical."
ReplyDeleteIt happens at our school and parents really hate it. The difficulty is that parents are never quite sure exactly what went on at school. And you don't want to put your child in the middle of an argument between parents and teachers. And you don't want to come across as one of "those" parents.
My son's class has had to stay in at recess and work. Other times, each child in the class had to write a letter of apology to the offended person. Actually, my son was not in the class that had to do this, but I did hear from the parent of another boy who NEVER gets into trouble. He wrote that he is sorry, but he is not sure why he should be sorry.
The only thing close to that approach is the one where they tell parents to punish both kids even if only one is at fault.
Unethical. Lazy. Copout.
I agree with LynnG:
"I have to think that detention for all for the crimes of a few has got to be an admission that peer pressure is a good thing."
"Didn't get an answer."
ReplyDeleteThey get stuck on the details. They're winging it. I'll find out soon when I meet with our public school principal and (try to) ask detailed questions.
At my son's private school, the classes are clear, except for perhaps some vague sort of "Humanities" classes. At the public (differentiated education) school, there are lots of "Reading" classes (45 minutes each) every week in 6th grade! They should be beyond just reading by sixth grade. They also have "Advisory" and "Planner" classes?!? Does anyone know what these are? If you are not in the band (my son plays piano), then you have a few more "DEAR" classes. (Drop Everything And Read) They have to stop calling them "teachers". Between the reading, advising, planning, and more reading, there is not a lot of time left for instruction. That's why they once referred to it as differentiated learning. The onus is on the child and the parent.
I guess that's the point. There is a lot more time for independent work. But do they have a plan for each child? Do they work with parents to define academic goals? Or do they just wait to see if the child asks for more work, whatever that means.
I think that differentiated instruction means "If you want more, then you do it." Or, "You want more? I'm not stopping you."
Ownership!
And you don't want to come across as one of "those" parents.
ReplyDeleteI am having a fine time being one of those parents!
In fact, I am having a fine time being the foremost exemplar of those parents!
My son's class has had to stay in at recess and work. Other times, each child in the class had to write a letter of apology to the offended person.
ReplyDeleteThis is unethical.
Period.
"KISS" - this is my new principle.
I don't argue.
I don't debate.
Collective punishment is unethical.
Ed and I lost sleep over the school board meeting last night.
ReplyDeleteWhat a horror.
However, parents were out in force; everyone universally opposes the "middle school model."
The MSS principal talked to a group of parents afterwards, deploying the usually tropes - parent triangulation, etc.
"You're all upset, but other parents don't feel this way. Other parents want these changes."
I have DRILLED Ed on the importance of parent choice (nobody gets this....UNTIL THEY GET IT)....
He began by challenging her assertion: name those parents. Who are they?
She parried that easily - parents have diverse views; there are many parents who want different things; etc.
(I particularly appreciate the implication that, somewhere in the district, in hiding apparently, is a set of parents whose wishes ARE being closely listened to by our administrators.)
He switched to parent choice.
"I support parent choice. Parents who want a middle school model can have a middle school model. Parents who want TRAILBLAZERS can have TRAILBLAZERS. Don't force it on our children."
That was the end of it.
After two years I've finally realized the argument is simply about who decides.
I can argue cog sci etc.
In the end it comes down to power and politics.
Adminstrators wield near-absolute and power and they wield it freely.
That's what they believe, at least. Our school administrators believe that power is free.
Power is never free.
There is always a price.
They are paying it in a pervasive and profound loss of legitimacy.
"I support parent choice. Parents who want a middle school model can have a middle school model. Parents who want TRAILBLAZERS can have TRAILBLAZERS. Don't force it on our children."
ReplyDeleteThere really is no other conclusion. the money (power) belong to the parents.
We are forced to argue about things we shouldn't have to argue about, like how to raise our children.
There really is no other conclusion. the money (power) belong to the parents.
ReplyDeleteright
Militant parents? An anonymous few that like the model, but can't be bothered to come to a meeting in support? You've got to be kidding.
ReplyDeleteThese are our kids. If we want the schools to primarily teach and secondarily worry about hormonal levels, shouldn't that be our choice?
They are paying it in a pervasive and profound loss of legitimacy.
But do they care? I doubt it. One of the payoffs of absolute power is the ability to thumb your nose at something trivial, like legitimacy.
Let me share a little story:
A couple years ago, we were in the midst of renovating and expanding the high school. As a result, there were some problems with heat in some sections. Also, construction had limited the number of kids that had lockers.
The (now former) principal decided this was a good time to implement rules for manners -- no coats were allowed to be worn in the school. I have no idea why he did this.
Students were in rooms that were below 40 degrees and were told they couldn't wear their coats. Other students didn't wear coats because they had no locker and there were no safe places to leave a coat. Parents came to the board meeting to complain -- why can't kids where coats if they're cold? Response: it's poor manners.
The Board unanimously backed up the principal. One board member said, "He has the pulse of the school." The pulse?
Talk about your loss of legitimacy.
Catherine: "Collective punishment!
ReplyDelete"Against the Geneva Conventions!"
Specifically, it's a violation of Part III, Section 1, Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention:
"No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited."
Since war crimes are deemed to be enforceable with universal jurisdiction, I'd recommend filing suit in The Hague.
good idea!
ReplyDeleteI assume they don't care about legitimacy - or, rather, the legitimacy they care about is the legitimacy they seek in the eyes of the "BLOB" (That's John Hoven, I think. Forget what it stands for.)
ReplyDeleteNevertheless, you can't run a school district without it.
We have a parent uprising, and a parent uprising is a very bad thing. It's already cost them the fields bond; it will cost more.
Meanwhile Eliot Spitzer says he's going to raise the cap on charters. That's what we really need. It's too late for us, but that's what Westchester County needs.
That's what every place means.
If I had to bet, I'd bet that the "middle school model" won't happen.
ReplyDeleteAt a minimum it will be tabled until we're out of there.
But...I'm guessing it won't happen.
Ed thinks it may be possible to block horrific constructivist reforms.
Getting them to assume responsibility for individual student learning is another story.
At the meeting our principal said, "My main goal is to get more support for the kids who are struggling."
yup!
Those struggling kids!
They need support!
Apparently he didn't mention the fact that many of the struggling kids are in the only two "accelerated" classes they offer.
Ed says there was daylight between the board and the administration last night.
ReplyDeleteHe also says the board obviously loathes us, which of course limits our ability to increase the amount of daylight between the board and the administration.
I'm not sure it matters, though. The place was flooded with furious parents; EVERYONE has had it.
The other issue is that the Board is taking the fall for the defeat of the bond proposal, which is wrong.
Getting that bond through was the superintendent's job.
The buck stops with her.
It would have sailed through if people hadn't been so furious about TRAILBLAZERS, Phase 4, differentiated instruction, and all the rest.