What’s Rational About That?
Glance through the table of contents of a grammar school or high school mathematics textbook an you are likely to encounter the term rational number. While you are familiar with whole numbers, fractions, decimals, and percents, you may well wonder what a rational number is and how you passed through your school mathematics classes without encountering one.
In fact, you did learn definitions, computation, and applications for rational numbers, although they may not have been identified as such in your class. A rational number is any number that can be expressed as a ratio of two whole numbers, and so 4/5 (the ratio of 4 to 5), 2/3 (ratio of 2 to 3), and in fact all fractions are members of the set of rational numbers. Also included are all terminating decimals such as 0.25 (equal to 1/4 or 1 to 4) and repeating decimals like 0.333 ... (equal to 1/3 or 1 to 3). Percents are rational numbers, too, as any percent has an implied denominator of 100; for example, 35 percent equals the ratio 35 to 100, or 335 out of 100 parts. Even ordinary, everyday whole numbers are members of the set of rational numbers, since a whole number such as 4 can be written as 4/1 or the ratio 4 to 1. So your math classes have involved work with all these types of rational numbers as you learned to compute, estimate, and solve problems with them.
This brief description of the major subsets of the rational numbers may give you the impression that all numbers are rational, but that is not the case. For example, the square root of the number 9 is 3, a rational number. But the square roots of numbers such as 5 and 10 do not equal whole numbers and cannot be expressed as ratios. So the square roots of numbers that are not exactly divisible are not rational numbers.
source:
Six-Way Paragraphs in the Content Areas Advanced Level
Based on the work of Walter Pauk
p 124
I don't know how to teach reading comprehension, or whether the Six-Way books work. But I like them very much.
A side note: I bought this one because I was going to use it to give C. "precis-writing" assignments. The idea was for C. to read a Six-Way passage and then cut the word length by 100 words a pass.
That turned out to be impossible. The passages are so tightly written that neither of us could figure out what to cut.
(Not sure about that last sentence.... "not exactly divisible" - is that a correct way to describe a repeating decimal?)
The fun thing about all the Six-Way books is that the passages are chock-full of factoids.
I like factoids.
Here's the one on stunt people C. and I tried to cut.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe sentence
ReplyDelete"So the square roots of numbers that are not exactly divisible are not rational numbers."
doesn't make any sense, so I would say it is ripe for editing. Divisibility is a concept that requires two numbers: 6 is divisible by 3.
Maybe what the author means is "If the square root of an integer is not an integer is must be an irrational number."
There is a fair amount of windiness, too. Take the sentence
"This brief description of the major subsets of the rational numbers ...."
could be nicely shorn of the phrase "the major subsets of"
Further warning: factoids aren't (for the most part) true:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factoid
As an aside, I think all square roots of numbers other than perfect squares are irrational. Same goes for cubic roots. The number world is much more irrational than meets the eye. A calculator doesn't help me though to show whether that's the case.
ReplyDeleteNBC's Nighly News will have a story on the math wars this Monday (today).
ReplyDelete"As an aside, I think all square roots of numbers other than perfect squares are irrational. Same goes for cubic roots."
ReplyDeleteI'll be pedantic and say that the square roots of whole numbers other than perfect squares are irrational.
The square root of 2.25 (9/4), for example, is 1.5 (3/2).
I don't know if this matters for purposes of this thread ...
-Mark Roulo
"NBC's Nighly News will have a story on the math wars this Monday (today)."
ReplyDeleteOne can hope, but remember the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect.
http://www.crichton-official.com/speech-whyspeculate.html
I broke my habit of watching nightly news ages ago. All I can hope is that they don't screw it up too badly.
It is a theorem that roots of integers are either integers or irrational. That is substantial, so it is not pedantic to say
ReplyDelete"... that the square roots of whole numbers other than perfect squares are irrational.
"
This is a non-obvious fact that takes a bit of number theory to get to.
The nightly news segment will feature the battle going on in NJ over Investigations.
ReplyDelete"The nightly news segment will feature the battle going on in NJ over Investigations."
ReplyDeleteI'm glad I didn't hold my breath.
I decided to google on journalism math degree requirements. College Algebra (an oxymoron), Excursions in Mathematics, and Trigonometry. Actually, it's really pathetic what college degree programs require now for math.
Have u try the
ReplyDeleteMath study online bookstore Cocomartini.com
http://www.cocomartini.com
I get all my textbooks for this semester from this bookstore. All are brand new textbooks and half price discount textbooks and cheap textbooks.
Good luck and wish some help.
hehe ^_^