I think the idea is that just as being a carpenter is a poor career choice for a person who suffers from epilepsy, similarly being a minister is a poor career choice for a person who suffers from stuttering.
But without even considering the semantic relationship between "epilepsy" and "carpenter", one can solve this problem by thinking about categories. "Epilepsy" and "Stuttering" are both medical conditions; "Carpenter" is a profession. Of the five choices available only "minister" is a profession.
Yes, that was the point of my second paragraph. But also, there is a semantic relationship between the specific disability and the specific kind of person. "Epilepsy is to carpenter as stuttering is to architect" would not have made sense, despite also being of the form "disability is to person as disability is to person".
I googled the question and found a blog post with the answer. I don't get it.
ReplyDeleteThe sample math questions are much easier.
http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/sat-act-history.html
I think the idea is that just as being a carpenter is a poor career choice for a person who suffers from epilepsy, similarly being a minister is a poor career choice for a person who suffers from stuttering.
ReplyDeleteBut without even considering the semantic relationship between "epilepsy" and "carpenter", one can solve this problem by thinking about categories. "Epilepsy" and "Stuttering" are both medical conditions; "Carpenter" is a profession. Of the five choices available only "minister" is a profession.
Simple:
ReplyDeleteDisability is to person as disability is to person.
Yes, that was the point of my second paragraph. But also, there is a semantic relationship between the specific disability and the specific kind of person. "Epilepsy is to carpenter as stuttering is to architect" would not have made sense, despite also being of the form "disability is to person as disability is to person".
ReplyDelete