kitchen table math, the sequel: copying sunflowers

Saturday, April 7, 2007

copying sunflowers

I have been reading up on Vincent Van Gogh to prepare to give a short Art Literacy lesson at my children's school. I will read from a script, but I do a better job if I have read more than the script, beforehand.

The constructivist ethos of our Art Literacy program is to give children as much freedom as possible in achieving the production goal that follows each lesson. In this case, the goal for each child will be to paint a sunflower and show its texture by using specially thickened paint and a palette knife. Vincent used a lot of paint on his canvases.

In art, as in learning to read words or to add numbers, constructivists do not want children copying someone else’s good idea, whether it's how to paint a sunflower or how to sound out a word or how to add two numbers by counting-on. The child who copies is the child of a lesser god. He has fallen short of the goal of constructing original aesthetic or literary or mathematical meanings.

So I will read the Van Gogh lesson script and assign the painting, but I'm not supposed to finish what I've started by leading the children step by step through one method of creating one copy of one of Vincent's sunflowers. I show them one sunflower, and then let them learn the rest by doing it themselves as best they can. Once. Because they won't get a second chance because there isn't time.

They must copy one of Vincent's sunflowers, but I can't teach them how to use the tools they are given to achieve an aesthetic meaning that would be mine and not their own. I would be putting words in their mouths, so to speak, if I led them.

I was amused to read letters that Vincent wrote to his brother Theo and find that Vincent was often quite skeptical of his fellow artists and their methods. Among other observations, here is one excerpt from a letter he wrote from St. Remy on the subject of copying another artist’s work:

It is a kind of study that I need, for I want to learn. Although copying may be the old system, that makes absolutely no difference to me. [I have copied the Pieta and] I am going to copy the Good Samaritan by Delacroix too. What I am seeking in it and why it seems good to me to copy them I will tell you - they are always asking we painters to compose ourselves and be nothing but composers. So be it - but it isn't like that in music - and if some person plays Beethoven, he adds his personal interpretation - in music and more especially in singing - the interpretation of a composer is something, and it is not a hard and fast rule that only the composer should play his own composition. Very good - and I, mostly because I am ill at present, I am trying to do something to console myself for my own pleasure. I put the black and white [Pieta] by Delacroix… in front of me as a subject - and then I improvise colour on it, not, you understand, altogether by myself, but searching for memories of their pictures - but the memory, the vague consonance of colours which are at least right in feeling - that is my own interpretation.

Many people do not copy, many others do - I started on it accidentally, and I find that it teaches me, and above all it sometimes consoles me.

I am sorry he was not consoled more, sooner.

During the Art Literacy lesson we are to tackle the subject of Vincent’s mental illness right out of the box because even the littlest kids already know that he cut off his ear, and we need to manage their interpretation of the event.

We can also say that Theo sent Vincent money to keep him alive and painting, and we can say everybody is sad that Vincent never knew how famous his paintings would become.

But we don't tell the children that he made copies. Or that he took art lessons in Paris and he read books on technique that Theo bought for him. We don’t explain that Vincent made preparatory sketches and studies before he painted. We skip right over his many careful revisions, as he frequently returned to favorite subjects in favorite colors like sunflowers. We don't tell the children that, in his correspondence with Theo (who was working for an art dealer in Paris) the two of them were always desperately trying to figure out how to sell more of Vincent's paintings.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great post, Becky. And great points.

Let us know how it all goes.

PaulaV said...

Becky,

Wonderful post! I think my son's third grade class did the same project on Van Gogh's sunflowers. He was disappointed that his didn't turn out so well. He said when he asked the art teacher (a very young art teacher) for help, she told him to just figure it out on his own.

When I asked him if he could get some help from his fellow classmates, he said that would be cheating.

BTW, I must add he is a perfectionist. He definitely thrives when given direct instruction.
So, it is no surprise that he says he hates art class.

--PaulaV

Alexander Barnett said...

Since you are interested in Vincent’s life and work, you might want to look at the Notes section on www.theeyesofvangogh.com. I am the writer and director of the new independent film on his life.

SteveH said...

The modern ethic in art is to create the new, unencumbered by the old. Judgments are deconstructed using the argument that all new art over the centuries had initial detractors. The result is that only the elite dare make comments or attempt to define what art is or should be.

In music, at least, there is a minimal level of skill that can be judged, regardless of the style. Kids learn how to make proper sounds, read music, play scales, and keep time.

In art, there is nothing. That's what they teach.

My son's art classes are all about showing a million different ways to create art, and no practice of any sort of basic skills. They don't even care how he holds a pencil. The results are junk. The only art he does well has been learned and practiced on his own.

Anonymous said...

Three points:
1. Contemporary pedagogy in art education begins with the idea that art comes from the art that came before us and from culture. It has been long acknowledged that we all learn by copying. We, meaning all of us-kids, grown-ups, Van Gogh, Picasso, other artists-everybody. Art teachers are supposed to teach by teaching specific skills & concepts to empower kids to express the ideas of art. Using the work of artists to show how artists used color, texture, line, etc. to express ideas IS the way to teach art. Anybody who still thinks that "art comes from within" is suffering from what might be called the "20th century hang-over." You have the right idea and stay true to it! Fear of contaminating kids by teaching them something is so 1950s.

2. When Commodore Perry opened the door of Japan to the world in 1858, artists went wild! The book "Japonisme: The japanese Influence on Western Art Since 1858" (S. Wichmann,2001) shows how many, many artists, including Van Gogh, copied japanese images. And they didn't just copy in a loose or general way. Van Gogh created carefully constructed grids in his efforts to understand the structure and composition of the Japanese art.

3. Some quick advice. Get past VG's personal problems with the ear story right away. Talk about him as a serious artist who learned how to draw from copying from books and other art, just like the other artists of his time. If you are going to show the painting of the sunflowers, I would also include a bouquet of real sunflowers for kids to see and examine closely. Looking at the real ones and VG's painting, examine VG's yellows. Those yellows are not straight from the bottle, but have lots of color blended into them. And look at the textures caused by VG's brush strokes. The kids can learn a lot b y copying these things, "in the manner of VanGogh."

Also, VanGogh said that art was like algebra: there are certain foundational skills that are necessary to know, and must be learned.

Best of luck,
Edie Pistolesi
Professor of Art
Department of Art,
Art Education area
CSU Northridge

Catherine Johnson said...

wow!

He really mentioned algebra??

amazing!

Catherine Johnson said...

But we don't tell the children that he made copies. Or that he took art lessons in Paris and he read books on technique that Theo bought for him. We don’t explain that Vincent made preparatory sketches and studies before he painted.

You should say all these things.

Then repeat them for emphasis.

Barry Garelick said...

If Van Gogh were subjected to today's classrooms, he'd end up working at MacDonald's like everyone else.

Catherine Johnson said...

he'd probably look like Jeff Goldblum, too

Anonymous said...

These are the words of Vincent Van Gogh from his letters to his brother. The first paragraph tells about a book he purchased to help him learn how to draw the figure. The second paragraph has the great comment about algebra.

Vol. II, Letter 381:

"I have bought a very beautiful book on anatomy, "Anatomy for Artists" by John Marshall. It was in fact very expensive, but it will be of use to me all my life, for it is very good. I have also what they use at L'Ecole des Beaux-Arts, and what they use in Antwerp..."

"The key to many things is the thorough knowledge of the human body, but it costs money to learn it. Besides, I am quite sure that color, that chiaroscuro, that perspective, that tone, and that drawing, in short everything has fixed laws which one must and can study, like chemistry or algebra. This is far from being the easiest view of things, and one who says, "Oh, one must know it all instinctively," takes it very easy indeed. If that were enough! But it isn't enough, for even if one knows ever so much by instinct, that is just the reason to try ever so hard to pass from instinct to reason. That's what I think."