kitchen table math, the sequel: Singapore Math scoring

Saturday, November 3, 2007

Singapore Math scoring

From an earlier comment by Myrtle on "Slave Parents in Singapore" regarding scoring in Singapore:
1: 75% and above
2: 70% to 74%
3: 65% to 69%
4: 60% to 64%
5: 55% to 59%
6: 50% to 54%
U: Below 50%, considered Un-graded, or failed.

Which to me looks like you only need 75% to get an A.

My understanding is that Myrtle is close. I was told last summer that 65% or above was considered mastery of a concept.

I gave my 3rd grade students the 3A placement test this week. Yes, right before Halloween (I'm such a mean teacher). I use the placement test that is online as it is what the students would normally take at the beginning of 4th grade to be sorted into ability groups.

I also figure this will point out areas that I need to revisit before we start on the 3B work. Or, as it turns out, not. Fifteen of my 17 students scored 85% or above, two students scored in the mid-70% range. Even Singapore teachers would consider that mastery.

If you look closely at the 3A placement test, you'll see that it is scored 2 points for a basic problem and 5 points for a word problem. I score 1 point for a basic problem - it's either correct or not, and 4 for a word problem, as follows:
1 pt correct bars
1 pt correct brackets or labeling of bars
1 pt math
1 pt answer in a complete sentence
The reasoning is that the word problems are so simple at this level, the concept to master is how to get the model method correct so that students can move on to more challenging problems.

As the year is sliding into the holiday non-stop party mode, I will probably hand out the 3B books, but intersperse units with standards that Arizona requires like discrete math, probability and tangrams.

12 comments:

le radical galoisien said...

There are some further values: 92+ is an A* (yes, there is a pretty wide gulf between 75 and 92, but all the better to stream people with...at least so the reasoning goes).

85+ is "Band 1", e.g. you're capable of EM1 (highest stream) work.

I remember that the main thing that prevented my P5/P6 class (they were the same, since they consider it inefficient to split the class up one year before the national exams) from being an EM1 class was the second language subject. Everything else was Band 1, except the second language subjects (Chinese, Tamil, etc.)

Also, what do you do if you have a student who doesn't use bar models and chooses to use another working method? Or do you not have mavericks in your class yet? ;-) (In some problems for the PSLE, I remember you could choose between several strategies, one of them being bar models and the other being simultaneous equations ...)

Catherine Johnson said...

Interesting.

Thanks for posting this.

Unknown said...

Le radical-
Are you still in Singapore? This summer I was told that recent changes that were going into effect this summer included subject banding. A student banded for High Ability (HA) math, might now be in MA or LA Mother Tongue or English. That's the point of the "new" subject banding as opposed to the less flexible "streaming".

Bar models are introduced in 3rd grade as the main method of problem solving. That is the emphasis. i brought back some iExcel books that included lessons in other heuristics that I will be using a little later in the year when the problems become a bit more challenging.

the Primary Math curriculum used here in the states has not been used in Singapore since 2001. It has been criticized for its emphasis on bar modeling. My Pals Are Here and Shaping Maths are the 2 major curricula used in Singapore currently and do integrate other heuristics.

Do I ever have mavericks. "Mrs. Turner, I can do this in my head!" Well, I hope so! Then I pull something out of a challenging word problem book and I hear "I don't get it". My response? The bars will show you the way.

le radical galoisien said...

Ah no, I haven't been in Singapore for 3 years ... terribly homesick too.

It's nice to know about the subject-banding; I first heard of it a while back (they proposed it while I was still a secondary school student there), but its status had been in limbo for a while.

They've abolished the GEP (Gifted Education Programme) too, merging them into the Integrated Programme stream (where International Baccalaureates and through-train A-levels reign).

Personally, I liked the GEP syllabus, but I sort of resented how apparently GEP students deserved a more "Western" education, while we mainstream students had to stick to pragmatic, grounded, over-Confucianistic "Asian values", so championed by our dear Lee Kuan Yew. So while the GEP took debate, philosophy and argument (an area which the IP has since taken over), we didn't, because our planned role for our lives did not include governing the country, just filling professional workforce slots.

A lot of the segregation is outright unnecessary. I like our education system's rigour, but I don't think rigour and flexibility are necessarily mutually incompatible.

Unknown said...

The most unusual question (and perhaps most indicative of the culture) we were asked was "Americans are so creative and the United States has had so many Nobel Prize winners. Do you have any suggestions for how Singapore can win more Nobel Prizes?"

Um, yeah.

Subject banding was in place at Cedar and Guanyang Primary, although I got the feeling it hadn't been implemented nationwide yet.

Cheryl van Tilburg said...

Hello from Singapore!

Actually, there's still a gifted program here for primary grades -- but it is getting smaller (only offered now at nine schools).... In fact, just yesterday the Straits Times had an article on the GEP: "Gifted Scheme Kids to Mix More with Others." (I'd include the link, but it's only available to paying subscribers.)

According to the article, "Started in 1984, the GEP was aimed at enabling the top 1 percent of each cohort to reach their full potential. The programme will be discontinued in secondary schools next year, since the integrated programme schools have their own programmes for gifted students. But GEP has continued to run in primary schools...to uphold 'the philosophy and practice of having distinct programmes for students of higher ability.'"

Here's the Ministry of Education's flow chart that describes the "educational landscape" in Singapore: www.moe.gov.sg/corporate/eduoverview/Overview_edulandscape.htm

And thanks for the essence of chicken description, LRG... sounds good, in weird way.

concernedCTparent said...

Thank you for the link to that chart. It makes so much more sense now.

le radical galoisien said...

Ah yes, I had forgotten it was still in place at the primary schools. But all my friends are either in secondary school, in the IB or IP programme, or in JC. ;-)

Instructivist said...

Algebra query:

I have an algebra worksheet from Instructional Fair to practice combining like terms. I am wondering if writing +- together as in the following example is a legitimate for of notation. I am used to putting things in parentheses as much as needed. This baffles me.

3(a+2b) +-(b+2a)

Help appreciated.

Anonymous said...

instructivist:

Yes, it's 3(a+2b) plus negative (b+2a).

Catherine Johnson said...

I'd never seen that notation before.

Catherine Johnson said...

I'm now taking algebra 1 for the 3rd time in my life.

I have to do C's homework set every night so I can check his work and have him re-do.