kitchen table math, the sequel: Steve H & Becky C on "independent study"

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Steve H & Becky C on "independent study"

from May 18, 2006, reacting to a sample tiered instruction assignment:

Where is the "instruction"? There is none, because Tiered Instruction is in their Independent Study section. I looked through everything they had there and all I ever found (in any section) was a reference to "mini-lessons" given by the teacher. They really have to stop using the word teacher or instructor because that is not what they are doing. Differentiated Instruction with no instruction. How about Differentiated Learning. Or, "You're on Your Own Learning".

This write-up looks more like a grading rubric. Perhaps they grade based on what they expect from a child. I've seen this before in job reviews. If you always exceed expectations, then you can't get much of a raise because you are just doing what you normally do. Are they going to give a "meeting expectations" to an "Above Grade Level" child and an "exceeding expectations" to a "Below Grade Level" child, even though the former student did more and better work? Of course, if you read the information at the site, the assessment is fuzzy and all individual. Once a Below Grade Level child; always a Below Grade Level child.

Even if one really thought that tiered (differentiated expectations) is a good thing to do, the explanation and examples on this web site are just so incredibly horrible.

Just look at this assignment. In eighth grade - "create a flag for Nunavut" is an Above Grade Level task. "Write an essay about what you would do if you were Prime Minister." Do about what? Citizenship? What in particular? "Trace your family heritage and present it." Just in Canada? How far back? Why? I've had assignments like this - poorly thought out and whipped together by lazy teachers.

Not only is it a wrong approach to education, it is done very badly.


here is Becky C:

Not a single one of these activities will be graded for quality. Did the Slow kid write well about his most memorable trip in Canada? Did the Medium kid do a good job representing the life of a PM? Did the Fast kid find the right amount of important details about the creation of Nunavat?

This is about teachers sending their teaching work home for parents to do.

As you might guess, we have had quite a few writing assignments sent home to our family this year from the public school. I have been working really hard to teach my boys to write. I have been feeling bitter about this.

Differentiated Instruction does not happen in real life. It is about as scarce as Direct Instruction.

and:

...if even one gullible parent of a 4th grader directly instructs her child how to write a summary paragraph by holding the child accountable for the quality of their paragraph, which is to say that the paragraph contains the right amount of important details... why, that's one more child who magically shows up in 6th grade already knowing how to write, and one less child that will need direct instruction in writing in 6th grade. Magical!

I've just HAD IT with writing assignments that are ASSIGNED to the student but are not GRADED constructively by the teacher as a means of instruction.

HAD IT HAD IT HAD IT


A mom in town here, who is actively concerned about the writing instruction, told me this week she would like to see her child get back just one paper without the sole feedback being the word "Terrific!" written on top.

Apparently she's decided to throw caution to the winds and skip the part about being careful what you wish for ...


6 comments:

Instructivist said...

"Just look at this assignment. In eighth grade - "create a flag for Nunavut" is an Above Grade Level task. "Write an essay about what you would do if you were Prime Minister." Do about what? Citizenship? What in particular?"

I don't know whether the economic, social, cultural and what have you conditions were described in detail in this hypothetical country. If they weren't, then this would add to the idiocy of the question.

Catherine Johnson said...

I'm getting the sinking feeling that open-ended assignments may be part of constructivist practice--a way of letting the student know what he wants to learn & assume responsibility for his own learning etc.??

? said...

The "hypothetical country" is a newly created territory in Canada.

? said...

"poorly thought out and whipped together by lazy teachers"

Yes, yes, and hey...be nice.

Anonymous said...

Wikipedia on Nunavut: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nunavut

***

Am I missing something here, in this project syllabus?

Below Grade Level: Creative

Learn to sing the national anthem in both languages.

For a below grade level student? I can see the importance of knowing the national anthem, even in both languages, but how does this assignment bolster the below grade level student’s greater understanding of the key concept Citizenship? Especially if they can learn to mimic the anthem well enough in both languages to get a grade, but don’t understand the words, sentiments, and historical importance of one or the other, or both?

Grade Level: Creative

Send a creative thank you letter to someone.

And if it's sent, this will be evaluated...how? And what constitutes "creative"?

Grade Level: Written

Do a favor for somebody and write about it.

How do either of these two assignments relate back to the KEY CONCEPT of Citizenship?

How is the student to connect doing nice things to being a citizen, or what citizenship entails?

Above Grade Level: Creative

Research how Nunavut became a territory, and create a flag for Nunavut.

Nunavut already has a flag. And a coat of arms. This is above grade level work? How about they compare the images and color symbolism to other flags? Create a display of flags which are similar, and compare the differences in meaning and symbolism? Or show illustrations of each portion and analyze them? Or anything except re-invent this wheel?

And how does it all relate back to Citizenship?

Unknown said...

"I've just HAD IT with writing assignments that are ASSIGNED to the student but are not GRADED constructively by the teacher as a means of instruction."

That's reprehensible, no matter what the subject. It's unfair to students, worst of all, because it deprives them of any chance to learn from what they did.