Written language is an unnatural foreign language, an artificially constructed code. Compare written dialogue with any transcript of an actual conversation, and you’ll see that written language has entirely different conventions, rules, and structures than spoken language. The rules of this foreign language must be learned by the beginning writer—and they have to become second nature before the beginning writer can use written language to express ideas.
This is why so many young writers panic, freeze, weep, or announce that they hate to write. Try to put yourself in the position of the beginning writing student: Imagine that you’ve had a year or so of conversational French, taught in a traditional way out of a textbook, with practice in speaking twice a week or so. After that first year, your teacher asks you to explain the problem of evil in French. You’re likely to experience brain freeze: a complete panic, a frantic scramble for words, a halting and incoherent attempt to express complicated ideas in a medium which is unfamiliar. Even another year or two of study won’t make this kind of self-expression possible. Rather, the conventions of the French language need to become second nature, automatic—invisible to you—so that you can concentrate on the ideas, rather than on the medium used to express them.
The same is true for young writers. Ask a student to express ideas in writing before she is completely fluent in the rules and conventions of written language, and she’ll freeze. She can’t express her thoughts in writing, because she’s still wrestling with the basic means of expression itself.I have become convinced that most writing instruction is fundamentally flawed because children are never taught the most basic skill of writing, the skill on which everything rests: how to put words down on paper.
Susan Wise Bauer
"Why Writing Fails"
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Susan Wise Bauer on the Young Writer
I have to jump on Silly Old Mom's post about Susan Wise Bauer's new writing program, Writing With Ease: Strong Fundamentals. As Susan so aptly pointed out in the comments, "She just nails it."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I may have to spend EVEN MORE MONEY purchasing these books....just to read them.
Which reminds me: I MUST get back to Kerrigan.
Kerrigan's book is fantastic, but it's not easy. (Not for me - I think his book would be easier for others. It's extremely well written and clear.)
You know, it's cheaper just to look at the sample pages.
I only found a few online (are we talking about the same book?)
I love your little mama duck thingie--
John McWhorther, whom I admire for his social commentary, really drowns in a sea of relativity in his area of expertise. Here his derisive comments on observing a modicum of good grammar:
http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=72430&v=5116994021
I still think saying I when me is called for is atrocious.
I love McWhorter but he's a purist when it comes to non-purism.
Post a Comment