kitchen table math, the sequel: Redshirting Kindergartners

Friday, August 1, 2008

Redshirting Kindergartners

Here's a story from today's Slate magazine about redshirting kindergartners.

"In addition, the trend toward older kindergarten among well-off families may be fueling the trend toward state laws that delay kindergarten for everyone. As Elizabeth Weil noted in a great piece on redshirting in the New York Times Magazine last year, almost half the states have pushed back their birthday cutoffs since 1975, several of them fairly recently."

"It's easy to see what the states are up to: They're worried about test scores, and they figure that older kids plus academic kindergarten will produce better ones."

"The increasing availability of public pre-K becomes, then, not the additional year of school that early childhood educators and advocates wanted for families that can't afford private preschool. Instead, pre-K, when it's offered, just replaces what the first year of kindergarten used to be."

""There is no evidence of a lasting benefit to education or earnings from being older than one's classmates," they (Deming and Dynarski) write. Another recent study, by Sandra Black of UCLA, crunched data from Norway and actually found a small boost in IQ for starting school early, but little effect on educational attainment—how well kids do in school in the long run. The place where redshirting is a proven advantage is the sports field. For example, 60 percent more Major League Baseball players are born in August than in July, and the birthday cutoff for youth baseball is July 31. But athletics, Dynarski points out, isn't academics."

4 comments:

Catherine Johnson said...

A friend of mine told me this week that there is a Pre-K school here for 5 year olds.

People are sending their kids there!

There are a couple of studies showing that redshirted kids do have a leg up when it comes to admission to elite schools (I posted that earlier).

Deming & Dynarski talked about those studies in one version of their paper, then edited the reference out (I believe).

The concept is that redshirted kids have an advantage in "tournament settings."

Soccer & Ivy League admissions are both tournament settings.

K9Sasha said...

What about kids being bored because the work is too easy?

At one point in my son's education we grade skipped him a year. The school ended up accelerating him even more. When I brought him home to homeschool I rescinded the grade skip as he needed more time to learn how to write - something the school wasn't going to teach him no matter how long he was there.

Last year, as a high school junior, he earned the top grade two out of three quarters in a chemistry class at the community college.

Some of these redshirted kids are going to be on the bright side of the bell curve. I would think boredom would be worse for them than being one of the younger students in class.

Catherine Johnson said...

It all depends on the school.

If the school "teaches to the top," the young kids are in trouble. (We've experienced that --- )

Catherine Johnson said...

I know I said this before, but the REALLY bad thing I saw with redshirting was 14 year old boys STILL in middle school.

If you're 14 and you're still having to chant FOCUS words in character ed assemblies....