Children who do not acquire fluent, legible handwriting in the early years often experience far-reaching negative effects on both academic success and self-esteem.(1)
“Handwriting is one of the basic building blocks of good writing and plays a critical role in learning,” Graham, Currey Ingram Professor of Special Education at Vanderbilt University’s Peabody College, said. “Young children who have difficulty mastering this skill often avoid writing and their writing development may be arrested. They also may have trouble taking notes and following along in class, which will further impede their development.”
There are three possible sources of children developing handwriting difficulties: a problem with the child, a problem with the teacher, or a problem with the curricula (and related materials).
In " How do primary grade teachers teach handwriting? A national survey",(3) the authors found that
Nine out of every ten teachers indicated that they taught handwriting, averaging 70 minutes of instruction per week. Only 12% of teachers, however, indicated that the education courses taken in college adequately prepared them to teach handwriting. Despite this lack of formal preparation, the majority of teachers used a variety of recommended instructional practices for teaching handwriting. The application of such practices, though, was applied unevenly, raising concerns about the quality of handwriting instruction for all children.
In a less-formal presentation of the national study data, Steve Graham is intereviewed:
Graham suggests that a return to consistent handwriting instruction, with an understanding of the challenges different children face, would not only result in more legible papers but also support overall learning across subjects.
“Teachers need to continue to teach their students how to properly form and join letters. We found that this sort of instruction takes place for 10 minutes or less a day in most schools, down from two hours a week in the 1950s,” Graham said. “At home, there are many things that parents can do to help their young children improve their penmanship. Activities such as identifying and tracing letters, forming letters from memory, copying words and playing timed games to see how quickly they can accurately produce written letters and words all go toward building this skill.”
There are two common handwriting approaches or curricula used in U.S. schools--one: traditional, based on the Palmer method, and two: "italicized" -- more flowing. The most popular of the former is Zaner-Bloser and the most popular of the latter is d'Nealian (developed by Donald Thurber).
There is very little research on the relative effectiveness and efficiency of each approach.
There is, however, a third way: Handwriting Without Tears.
I spent Friday and Saturday at a Handwriting Without Tears seminar. Handwriting Without Tears (HWT) was created in the 1970s by an occupational therapist as a remedial program, and over the decades, has grown into (1) a pre-K through 5th grade classroom curriculum and (2) a remedial program..
It works as a classroom curriculum because the letters are taught in logical order, the letter formation skills are taught to mastery, and the curriculum uses multisensory methods. The teacher watches for, and immediately corrects, errors in letter formation, and the curriculum includes frequent "Review and Mastery" opportunities.
It works as a remedial program because HWR's authors have structured remediation in small, precise steps.
I highly recommend Handwriting Without Tears.
1. Feder KP, Majnemer A. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Apr;49(4):312-7.
2. Volman MJ, van Schendel BM, Jongmans MJ. Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jul-Aug;60(4):451-60.
3. Graham S, Harris KR, Mason L, Fink-Chorzempa B, Moran S, Saddler B Reading and Writing 2008 21(1-2):49-69.
Elsewhere:
Handwriting Key to Learming, Newsweek, November 12 2007
LD Podcast: Dr. Steve Graham on writing development.
Interview with Steve Graham
Previous KTM Posts referencing Handwriting
Somewhere in a Well to Do District
Learning in a Castle of Fear
Speed Test
25 comments:
I am using the HWT materials for my kindergartener (printing) and second grader (cursive). Do you have any good suggestions for improving the efficiency, legibility, and ease of writing for an older child, in our case a fifth grader?
I have my fifth grader working on Spencerian penmanship exercises. They seem to be improving her cursive strokes so that not only is her work more legible and flowing, it's easier on her hand. She seems to have developed a very flawed technique (that I didn't pay attention to until we homeschooled) and now I'm doing my best to remediate weak instruction. While I do see improvement, I always wonder if there is a better way.
I love HWT! I've been using it at home with my 1st grade son for the last month. His school 'tries' to teach correct letter formation but he's a kid who needs someone sitting right by him, giving instant feedback. We've been practicing handwriting at the same time we practice his spelling words, so we aren't going through the book in the recommended order, but it seems to be working! His number reversals are almost gone and his spelling papers aren't coming home covered in red ink anymore.
We use HWT, too!
I tried another cheaper program, but it resulted in some number reversals. HWT is very good for preventing reversals (my daughter had very strong images of the letters from our phonics work, so we had no letter reversal problems with letters, but HWT is also helpful for children who reverse letters.)
I absolutely believe this -- when you're the parent of an older child who can barely print you REALLY see the pain&suffering lousy handwriting leads to.
btw, I like Getty & Dubay's Write Now for adults (at least, I liked it for me - only got halfway through)
I love the Spencerian handwriting!
Have you looked at the world handwriting contest entries???
I have Barchowsky's book, too, but never used it...
Well, from a distance, that's a tough one.
You might look at her grip, and compare it to the models in the HWT teachers' guides (I assume you have the teachers' guides).
If her grip is flawed (thumb over pointer finger is a common flaw), that would be the first thing to address.
You might ask her how she feels about her handwriting -- does she like it the way it is now, or would she like it to be a bit easier to write?
Personally, I am not a great fan of the Spencerian hand as a method of introducing cursive -- too many loops, wiggles, and flourishes for the <12 set. Also, the only reason for the slant, after all, is a vanished technology: quill and dip pens. They could not produce a steady upright line without spluttering from the spread nib.
After a child has learned to produce a neat and legible upright hand (in the HWT style) he or she is free to embellish the hand, if that is an area of endeavor that appeals to the child.
Boy, I wish I'd known about Handwriting without Tears 4 years ago. (I did know about it but I didn't get it...)
I'm going to check out the remedial program - for me, if not for C.
My previous comment was directed at concerned CT parent, whose daughter is struggling with her handwriting.
And Catherine -- Jan Olsen has successfuly taught children with Downs and other neurological problems to print and write cursive, using HWT.
Thanks Liz. I do have the teacher's guides. She does the Spencerian doodles for fun and it has improved her stroke and she seems to be more aware of her grip. I hadn't thought to use the HWT cursive with her though. I'm going to have to pay closer attention to her grip and analyze her cursive with HWT in mind.
Her biggest struggle at this point is that she's placing too much pressure on the writing implement and as such, tires easily. Her cursive is actually quite nice when she puts her mind to it. When she needs to write quickly, however, the legibiity decreases significantly.
I think we talked about this long ago. My son doesn't print very well, but his cursive is very nice. I think it forces him to slow down. Teachers now think it's weird if he hands in assignments in cursive. They want it done on the computer.
Actually, nobody ever taught him how to hold a pencil correctly. They were doing journals in Kindergarten, but not learning how to hold a pencil. When I talked about this with his second grade teacher, she basically said that it's too late. Like everything else, his schools thought it was drill and kill. Spelling? Don't worry about it. Content? Superficial knowledge.
If your child writes left-handed, you need to make certain he or she aligns the paper correctly (top slanted toward the right, with the forearm parallel to the long edge) so he doesn't have to twist his hand to keep from covering what he's just written.
My second-grade teacher didn't know that, and tried to make me change. Family drama ensued.
To the first commenter: one thing to watch for when the child is writing is whether she's drawing the letters or writing the letters. If it's the former, she needs help to get the muscle memory in place.
This whole issue just makes me laugh. One parent-teacher conference in primary, I was shown an example of 'good' '4' handwriting (as opposed to my child's near-illegible essays). It was clear that the author was taught at home as the sample was certainly not the school's chosen print -- D'Nealian. Once an apples to apples comparison was done, it was found that no one in the cohort could write legibly in true D'N. at that age. The school did change as a response though. Kinders now use fat markers instead of thin pencils in order to develop a proper grip before instruction is given in Gr. 1. They do sentences on the PC rather than all on paper. Gr. 1 instruction dropped the insistence on using the D'N slants & tails and went to spending time on fluency. My younger child's print is great in comparison.
We are just getting into remediating this issue with our older child. We have yet to hear back from the OT as to whether the kid is a curriculum casualty or dysgraphic (and have ruled out vision related issues). In the meantime, cursive via Peterson Directed Handwriting is the summer plan, barring something magical out of the OT's hat. Peterson puts emphasis on developing muscle memory, rhythm, and fluency, which should be quite helpful in retraining. Showing the kid how he was working against his muscles by not slanting the paper correctly was quite an impressive start.
My kids' preschool uses HWT as their handwriting curriculum. My impression so far is that it has done a good job teaching each letter form as a whole, but that as implemented there my daughter has not learned proper stroke direction/order or pencil grip. (This is more likely a critique of the teaching rather than the program, but it's something to keep in mind.)
When we do Englemann reading lessons I am very careful to do and comment on the writing task, and I correct pencil grip whenever I notice. I'll watch this more carefully with kid #2. :-)
Anonymous wrote:
as implemented there my daughter has not learned proper stroke direction/order or pencil grip.
It just goes to show that a great curriculum can be undercut by lousy implementation.
HWT's preschool teacher's manual emphasizes the importance of teaching correct grip, and continuing to teach and model until all the children have mastered either the tripod grip or the quadropod grip.
This comes before any other activity.
Likewise, the directionality of letters is taught before the children even begin writing.
You might want to order the Pre-K teacher's guide yourself to re-teach over the summer.
Hmm, I've never actually heard the phrase quadropod grip, so I wonder if her grip is as wrong as I'd been told by some (older) teachers at K programs who observed her, who I inferred were advocating tripod only. The workbook/teachers guide are pretty inexpensive, so might as well just order them and grok it myself.
As for order, it's just a few letters -- rereading my post I was probably overstating the prevalence.
My gifted 4th grader was falling further and further behind in all things fine motor.
So I took him to a private OT, who used HWT.
We found out he was forming his letters wrong, using too much pressure, and holding the pencil too hard.
He worked with the OT for four months--relearning how to write, and working on overall strength, with an emphasis on integrating visual-motor.
Now he can write for pages and pages, and he can finally tie his shoes.
Why didn't anybody in his school notice what was wrong? Not one teacher ever said anything to me about it.
It's because handwriting is a SKILL. They don't teach skills in my district. Everything is discovery, inquiry, and holistic.
This high IQ was underachieving. How many other kids could be achieving so much more if somebody in the school would pay attention to their OT issues? If somebody would teach them skills with precision?
This high IQ was underachieving. How many other kids could be achieving so much more if somebody in the school would pay attention to their OT issues? If somebody would teach them skills with precision?
Exactly. This isn't just about illegible handwriting. Children who struggle with the mechancial process of recording words on paper will want to do less of it. They will pare down big ideas into something small for the sake of avoiding the struggle. How long did it takes humans to develop a system of writing? Children don't discover things like this on their own. Writing is a skill developed over the centuries that has taken generations to develop and even more generations to perfect. Children aren't born knowing how to write properly and they will not learn efficient manners of doing so without directly being taught how.
Liz,
In your workshops and teaching, I wonder if you have come across any research suggesting that we are teaching handwriting in the wrong order. The charter school where my daughter attends teaches cursive in Kindergarten and printing in first grade. They claimed it helped in the diagnosis of dyslexia and actually improved reading and spelling skills. I was skeptical but after eight months my six-year-old daughter writes as well and as fast as most fourth graders. When I asked her to print something the other day, she did fairly well despite the fact that neither the school or I have taught her to print (although I noticed she tended to start every letter from the lower “starting line”).
Doug
Doug, that's really interesting. I would love to know if Liz (or anyone) has references to that type of research.
I do know that in Mexico, children are taught cursive first. Printing doesn't happen until much later. The printing is actually very stylized, visually appealing, and easy to read. My father has perhaps the best penmanship (both printing and cursive) that I've ever come across and great emphasis was placed on this aspect when he was in school in Mexico.
I believe a number of other countries teach cursive before printing. It would certainly be interesting to know the research behind that.
When my oldest daughter was 5 she attended a Carden school for first grade. They learn cursive in first grade after working carefully on printing skills in preschool through kindergarten. Penmanship is a significant part of the curriculum. When we moved out of state in second grade, none of the children knew how to write in cursive and she was asked to submit her work in printed form. Her cursive was beautiful when she entered second grade and suffered greatly by the end of that year.
The difference in first grade is that penmanship was part of the instruction. The teachers were trained to teach the children proper pencil grip, letter formation, etc. Once we left that traditional learning environment, it was something that the child was to develop on their own by working harder. It seems that was the point the onus shifted from the teacher to the student. A deterioration in her penmanship resulted.
In hindsight, I clearly should have been more aware of her penmanship and jumped in and done something about it. Now, we're going to have to do some penmanship remediation. I won't make that mistake with younger two, that's for sure.
This entire thread just highlights what a gift KTM is for me.
I think it's hard to be aware at the time because you have no idea what skills you took for granted in early grammar school.
I have terrible penmanship. I was taught Palmer cursive and I was very good at it in grammar school, but printing was always awkward, and I never knew why. So, even though I loved math and science, taking notes in math and science courses was always a bear.
By high school, I'd stopped taking notes in science class because they were illegible after 4 minutes. In college, I typed everything I could, and by senior year, I had finally learned that I had to type my math and physics work in a typesetting program in order to know what I'd written. I did that throughout all of grad school. Experimental notebooks were the worst, because I'd be expected to take down numbers and notes over the course of several hours.
My hand hurts after I write the smallest amount---4 checks, and my hand hurts. I can't balance my checkbook properly because I can't read my writing, and nothing seems to help.
I had no idea that I could be using too much pressure, holding the stylus improperly, etc. but it would explain the fatigue I feel, my own deterioration in penmanship within minutes, etc.
Sadly, though, you've just added another course to the list of things I would be lousy at homeschooling....at least, though, when my kid gets there, maybe by then I'll have remediated myself enough.
Doug
You might want to check out this link.
http://donpotter.net/PDF/Cursive%20First.pdf
I'd appreciate readers' comments on my own handwriting site -- http://www.HandwritingThatWorks.com .
By the way ... slant in handwriting existed long before pointy quill pens: and even in the pointed-quill-pen era (writing with that tool that allegedly caused and required a slant), some writers produced a slantless writing. (The head of one well-known handwriting program mentioned elsewhere in this thread, who enjoys claiming that "pointed pens caused slant and were the only cause of slant," admitted to me once that she didn't actually know if her claim held true: "I put that statement into my program training because I felt I had to say something about the issue and I didn't really know, so this seemed like a logical enough guess that I could decide to say it was true." When I pointed out to her that the facts speak against her guess, and asked if she would like a referral to one or more historians of handwriting who could fill her in on how slant actually did arise, she thought this over and then said that she'd rather not have that info because (she said) "if I saw that my guess was actually off-target, then I would have to accept the responsibility and financial cost of changing my books and presentations, as well as confusing people by changing my story just to be accurate. I can't see [she said] how something as minimal as being accurate should be allowed to get in the way of my business success as a program developer and instructor. I put it in the book the way I guessed it, I said the guess was fact because it seemed reasonable to me at the time, so it would be hypocrisy on my part to consider changing it just because the facts might be different.") ?!?!?!
Kate Gladstone
Founder and CEO, Handwriting Repair/Handwriting That Works
Director, the World Handwriting Contest
http://www.HandwritingThatWorks.com
Post a Comment