Your Child Left Behind
I think Mark Roulo left a link to the new article on Hanushek's research in the Atlantic.
I've posted a list of pulls on the Irvington Parents Forum.
They do what they do.
I think Mark Roulo left a link to the new article on Hanushek's research in the Atlantic.
I've posted a list of pulls on the Irvington Parents Forum.
Posted by Catherine Johnson at 2:49 PM 5 comments
Labels:
Catherine,
decline at the top,
international comparisons
Speaking of ditching the daily lesson plan, Allison wrote:
For those so enamored with preparing kids for the real world, why do they want school at all? Wouldn't child labor better? That would integrate everything.
Posted by Catherine Johnson at 4:18 PM 0 comments
Labels:
21st century skills,
Allison,
Catherine,
the real world
If you think about the “real world” that we’re preparing kids for, how often is the “real world” day broken up into science moments, math moments, writing moments, etc?I don't know about you, but for me the "real world" day gets broken up into science moments, math moments, writing moments, etc. any time I happen to be doing science, math, writing, and 'etc' all on the same day.
If you think about the “real world” that we’re preparing kids for, how often is the “real world” day broken up into science moments, math moments, writing moments, etc? We engage all of these things at all times.No we don't.
Also, it’s not like integrated units are anything innovative…True.
Kids don’t need a six-week unit on mastering quotation marks; they need to learn to master the quotation marks piece in the screenplay they write collaboratively about the people of Iceland solving problems around a catastrophic tectonic event that includes the gathering and analysis of quantitative data.oh, man
Posted by Catherine Johnson at 3:28 PM 19 comments
Labels:
Catherine,
interdisciplinary,
teaching grammar and writing,
wholeism
Does anyone have any comments on a product called "WordSmart High School Excellence"? I got a call out of the blue based on something my son filled out at school, although he doesn't know what that was. The implication is that this product is recommended by our school and that we can get a big discount because of that. To get the discount, they have to arrange a time to call me back. I'm trying to find out whether his high school really recommends the product or not. When I read the guidance dept. info on the school site, they talk of putting together an IEP for each child and that the parent plays an integral role. Right now, I don't feel integral.
Our state will get Race To The Top money, so our town is putting together a plan that is based on the state test. The goal is:
"90% of students entering the 4th and 8th grades will be proficient in reading and math on our state assessment"
This is really a Race To The Average. Do most parents think that state proficiency levels are good enough for their own kids? I don't think so, but do they think the money will help their kids? I haven't seen our (58 page!) proposal yet, but I can't imagine that there is anything more than a guess and check approach to increasing the numbers.